Abstract Preparation Rules

Our congress welcomes all research topics and subjects, regardless of the main theme.

🔹 Word Limit:
Each abstract may contain a maximum of 300 words, including the following sections: Introduction, Methods, Results, Conclusion, and Keywords (see format below).
The word limit does not include the title or author names.

🔹 Formatting Guidelines:

• Abstract text should be written in Times New Roman, font size 12, and 1.15 line spacing.

• The title should also be in font size 12 and written in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.

• Author names should be formatted as Surname N.

• The presenting author’s name must be underlined.

• Institutional affiliations should be indicated with superscript symbols such as *, **, ***, etc., matching the order of authors.

🔹 Important Notes:

• Tables, figures, and images are not allowed in the abstract text.

• Abstracts will not be edited or corrected by the organizing committee. Authors are fully responsible for the content and formatting of their submissions.

🔹 Presentation Preference:

• At the end of the abstract, please indicate your preferred presentation type (Oral / Poster)
  
• Please note that the final decision will be made by the Academic Evaluation Committee, and your request may not always be accommodated.
  

Research Abstract Layout

Title

The title should be concise, informative, and relevant, but does not need to be overly technical or dull. Use clear and simple language. It should accurately reflect the content of the study and provide enough information to facilitate proper classification.

Authors

List the first author and co-authors using the format Surname N.. Include their institutional affiliations (e.g., medical faculty and country, or the supporting organization for the research). The presenting author’s name must be underlined.

Introduction

Provide brief background information to frame the context of your research. Clearly state the research aim or question, either as a direct question or as a hypothesis. Use key terms that will also appear in the conclusion to ensure thematic consistency.

Methods

Describe the study design, specifying independent and dependent variables, data collection methods, and any statistical analyses used.

Results

Summarize the main findings of your study, aligning them clearly with the stated aim or research question. Be concise and specific.

Conclusion

Present the final outcome or answer to your research question. Keep it clear and aligned with your findings. Emphasize key takeaways.

Keywords

Select up to three keywords that best represent the essential elements of your study. These should support the discoverability and classification of your research.

Case Report -Clinical Vignettes- Abstract Guidelines 

This category is intended for individual clinical cases that have significant educational value, demonstrate unusual presentations, or offer insights into diagnostic or therapeutic decision-making. These abstracts follow a structured clinical vignette format, commonly used in academic congresses.

Title

The title should be concise, informative, and relevant, but does not need to be overly technical or dull. Use clear and simple language. It should accurately reflect the content of the study and provide enough information to facilitate proper classification.

Authors

List the first author and co-authors using the format Surname N.. Include their institutional affiliations (e.g., medical faculty and country, or the supporting organization for the research). The presenting author’s name must be underlined.

Introduction

Briefly describe the clinical context or relevance of the case.
Explain why the case is notable, whether it’s due to diagnostic challenge, rarity, or an instructive management aspect.
It is acceptable to begin directly with the case description if context is self-evident.

Case Description

Present the case in logical sequence:
Patient history
Physical examination findings
Diagnostic work-up
Management and outcome

Focus on relevant details and avoid overloading with unnecessary information.

Discussion

Highlight the clinical significance or lesson of the case.

Comment on decision-making processes and possible alternatives.

Briefly reference relevant literature (if applicable) to support or contrast your approach.

Avoid overstating novelty (e.g., “the first ever…”), unless supported by thorough evidence.

Keywords

Choose up to 3 keywords that reflect key clinical concepts in the case.

These support indexing and topic classification.